Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24483688-20140506172027/@comment-178.222.136.39-20140628171951

> "They created that charity after the huge backlash from asking for money when they have plenty"

Their hobby is making ridiculous videos and stuff (that random game sure - it's all random absolutely - that's why it's laughable) - ok, but - their business is: commercialy promoting stuff on YouTube - let's not forget that - that's how they earn money - of course they must feature that fundraiser site - nothing is by accident when they have so much viewers - they are promoting the site (surely they got some money from indiegogo - I think I didn't know about indiegogo until they featured it - so - guess what: it works!) - that's their job - what else could one expect.

And of course: they should give to charity if they have so much - go ahead contact them - surely they will listen to you. (They are just two individuals - they are not a social institution, they are not obligated to - but - yeah sure - why not.)

> "too homo? think they're funny? You sir, just lost all credibility."

...what... ?

Nothing paradoxical there. I mean: there is tonnes of just simply general subject funny ridiculous stuff (see for example all "If Movies Were Real" videos) - MOST of their videos even is exactly that, they are ridiculizing everything - that is the reason most of the subsribed ones watch them, plus they have girlfriends - and simply the fact is: most people would immediatelly unsubscribe if they realized they weren't merely joking. No oppinions necessarily intended, that's just: ...fact.