Thread:Paralie Marquena/@comment-24527343-20170729165232/@comment-26998681-20170804200858

I'm sorry you don't agree with my edits. :-/ They don't need to be undone; they are in good faith. It's a LOT to be looking at each one. But hey, if you need to edit/feel something needs to be changed, you need to edit. I get that. Just consider it subtracting/adding information if you ever want to change something; in the end, it's all touching/typing. Issues get run into like this when multiple people are in a group.

I have a lot of inboxes I check and a lot of e-mail/messages to answer and read; this inbox is understandably going to be my lower priority and I check it not very frequently. Approximately once a week, but I feel like I'm checking a little more because I have a little twinge of trepidation that Ian or someone else will leave and I'll have a little message telling me, as well, and Atbryan was the one who first actually informed me, basically, that Anthony had left. And he's right about me replying. As time goes on, I may check the inbox less as I believe I used to. I don't have time to take on about another inbox on a regular basis, let alone a wikia inbox. :p

I remove links many times because the link is repeated over and over on the page, and this is not needed and makes the page look cluttered. A link appearing once is fine and sometimes if it looks really good, 2-3 times, especially if it's a very long article, of which there are not many - yet! (well, there probably won't be too many...) If I do come back to an article you've ever undone edits on, maybe that day I feel differently about where position of links should be, or I don't see another repeated link when I remove one...while not an exact science, there is a general principle involved.

Some links I remove because it's a dead link. I believe things should only be linked if there is a page they can go to. Sometimes I get lucky and the dead links are actually live links but just wrongly link to the page and I can make the link live and remove the dead link. I never, ever would completely remove a link. A dead link leads nowhere and can even confuse people that don't know better or disappoint. IMO, it's pointless. Better to leave it blank until at least a stub can be created and then go back and quickly activate any "links" on pages that can sensibly link to the newly created page.

Categories? I'm not sure why you are asking me. Categories are a simple thing. Categories are just that I add/remove categories for the same reason as anyone...it fits, helps with organization...just look at your reasons, and those are mine. :p

Yeah, I help out on this place a lot so I have a lot of points, per the set system. We all help a lot and thus get points. There's no drama there. Just a difference of opinion, and we seem to both strongly believe in our stances, on structure/what should be there and what shouldn't.